General Discussion Topics, page-56112

@Verplak85 - Yeah I totally agree mate. Nothing you or I say will or can move the market on any ASX traded stock. That's why I only really ever try to stay neutral or impartial if anything in keeping to ONLY providing information and research on a stock.

And I am certainly not over on the other forum saying that Sayona has more claims to a comparative valuation to Frontier than the other stock does.
Even though this is actually a fact because back in October when Sayona was paying $125 million for a 60% stake in Moblan , Frontier was only valued at approximately A$160 million.

So effectively , the Moblan project was FULLY valued at roughly A$208 million which underwrote the Projects as ' Equals ' . So now Frontier has blossomed to its current Australian Dollar equivalent of A$693 million ....so over $500 million more than it was when it was deemed an ' Equal ' back in October.

So these are FACTS not SPECULATION. But you have been telling people that CRR's claim for a couple of nearology tenements like Musk Metals that it should be worth as much as Frontier .....and yet calling Sayona's price down. Can you see the difference in that......

So I am only pointing this out as an observation and WHY people might think you have an obvious agenda. I personally don't care what view you have so long as it is balanced and in support and justification for what you're flogging. And so I'm only saying that what you speak about is NOT consistent and that is why people are having a problem with it.

So I'm trying to help you mate.

So with your posts and my response to you , I'm again only trying to show you how your obvious vagaries and preferences look and why other investors here would take a view of what your motives may or may not be.

But I reckon your latest comment re : Crawford says it all now as to what your motives are ....and probably a bit harsh. I would have chosen a different path in getting my point across with a statement that reflects more the truth in that they ( Sayona Management ) have obviously recognized the shortcomings - ie errors etc...., and understaffing situation as well as the clear added responsibilities of the ever expanding Canadian reporting requirements and they have in turn made moves in the direction to improving those shortcomings accordingly.

But to say that without having taken these steps to just state that he should get the boot is obviously endeavoring to place a dark cloud over the BOD and Management and creating shareholder doubt which I think is unnecessary at this point in time and uncalled for.