General Discussion Topics, page-56645

Mate. To be fair. Not everything you state is FACT either. Like your supposition and suggestive comments that Brett and Sayona Management have done the things they have done , and in particular their APPARENT choice of ' PERCEIVED ' silence as being ' Intentful ' and .....I think you actually said ' On Purpose' .

So where is the proof of this then. This is NOT fact at all. In fact it could almost be perceived by some as more ' slanderous ' in nature.

So having a go at Split and calling him out as if his comment was not an oversight or error and more an intention to be misleading is also a ' conjecture ' of interpretation by you and only you.

But you're suggesting it so others will potentially believe it. Which is what you are doing with your constant repetitive posts about the same thing with Sayona Management and the comms etc....

So I personally feel as though , the more you say it , the more you hope that some of it will stick and perhaps then has the effect of ' dissuading ' others from perhaps investing in Sayona.

So I also agree in your comment to ' Trust No One ' in social media including HC.

I also agree to the notion that should one wish to participate in ' socials ' ( including HC ) , then one ought to take the privilege as more of a responsibility in keeping as best they can to the ' factual observations ' , analysis and research of their investments.

Because that is the essence of why we are here right ? To discuss the factual issues concerning our stock that we hold and / or are contemplating on holding. So speculation is certainly going to play a role in terms of the Company itself - But where the speculation gets a bit dicey is when you start to be more suggestive of what Management's and or certain personalities in the Company ranks are without any proof of your suggestions or conjecture.

So its one thing to speculate lets say on the potential ' takeover ' targets in potentially expanding their respective Abitibi or Northern HUBs - But its quite another to be speculating that Management has been intentional in their approach to suggested timings and disclosures which you claim have been intentionally selfish and / or harmful to Mom & Pop Investors. Because this is not really a subject for you to comment , but more one for the Authorities like ASIC or the ASX if they deem it as so.

But you and anyone else who seems so ready to comment on their holdings movements ....seem to carry this persona that you are somehow the ' Judge , Jury , and Executioner ' of PC or BL's Management Actions.

But at the same time has anyone here actually done the analysis of how many shares have been bought versus how many shares have been sold or acquired over the entire journey of this Company ? I know I have but I haven't seen anyone else provide this information or analysis into their average costs of their holdings. So I know exactly when and how much they have sold right back to the very beginnings and formation of this Company.