Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

green energy is a disgrace and a lie, page-124

First 124 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
tbirdsrgo

14,065 Posts.

476

10/06/22

12:18

Post #: 61939522
Share

Originally posted by gumUnderfoot: ↑

What part of that do you have issue with?

I specifically cut and pasted what I addressed in my facetious way.
I have no issue with your post.
I explained why we have a reasonable understanding of nature in regards to your statement.

It is entirely possible that we are intruding on nature without any proper understanding of "nature".

You say without a proper understanding and I say a reasonable understanding with a 0.1 billion year margin of error.

Do you see how nature has an adverse effect shown in the video I posted?
Did you watch the video?

It addresses your comment:

What if 'nature" reacts adversely with unintended consequences that we will find out some time down the track -

See how far down the track I gave you in the video?

this is a long run scenario

See how the video portrays a long run scenario?

and that is why we use modelling - poorly IMO."

See the 0.1 million years margin of error I have pointed out to you specifically in my posts?
However, NASA's modelling as outlined in my previous posts aren't poor.

So, you still haven't answered if humans are or are not significantly contributing to climate change.

Expand

OK if you have no issue with my original post - why carry on like a pork chop?
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Unemployment expectations correctly called today's 4.3% rate

GDM

Great Divide 'rapidly evolving' into commercial miner with first Challenger pour

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

BRU

Buru sinks -8% on adjusted Rafael Gas Project timeline aimed to 'reduce risk'

ASX Market Close: Pretty boring day, but we're back in the 8,600s

First 124 Last

SPONSORED BY