"The difference is that POD has already a "massive" 1km+ deep, 15m wide and 15km long proven mineral system"
I think you have answered the question this thread is posing with your statement above.
The market is probably looking for a relatively shallow and horizontal laying deposit like Chn and Platreef rather than a cliff hanger thats only 15m wide and over 1km deep ore body notwithstanding its 15km long.
Given a choice i think the market knows which deposit it would prefer. All imo.
POD vs. GAL, page-8
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
