Butcherboy I've noticed you never bring anything new to these discussions. You merely repeat 1) Big Oil conspiracy 2) Descredit any author, link to point 1.
It tends to indicate how lightweight your protestations are.
This is all rather juvenile. If you'd bother to research the matter you'd know that 'Big Oil' has significant investment in the AGW industry. The emails we are discussing even reference in several places where grant monies are being pursued from 'Big Oil'.
Care to point out how 'Exxon' funding compares to the billions poured in from goverment and other sources? Oh, it's a massive reported $19 million. Hold the phone!
Didn't the BBC spend a reported 6 million pounds on a single highly critisised television ad? The rest of the numbers poured in make $19 million a rounding error.
Your assertion that skeptics are only interested in this isue due to 'big oil' funds is rather pathetic. I can assure you I have received no such funds.
