Ann: Corporate Presentation, page-31

Absolutely not Reuters, Morning sunrise etc. I agree with you. For mine it’s The BJM, The Lancet and, the journ. of infect. diseases and epidemiology. Peer reviewed, quality evidence and solid met-analysis/ retrospective studies, also with numerous gold std double blind placebo trials thrown in for good measure but as you say, this is not a forum to discuss the benefits/ risk of vaccination. What does intrigue me though is why your sentiment is held/hold for this stock when you clearly have such misgiving’s. For all their previous disasters the current board must be doing something right for you to stay invested in a company managed by such nefarious, incompetent fools. I’d be interested in the positive attributes of this company that keep you on board. These forums are the all richer for differing opinions, and I welcome yours. Just as an aside, I had my fourth booster last week and since then I have noticed that all my devices are showing 5G coverage when I hold them in the hand that received the jab. I’m a little concerned but the reception is amazing.