Good News & Bad News, page-12600

I make that assumption (Sky news) based on your regurgitation of the Sky mantra - Windmills bad, nuclear good, solar and wind not good enough for base load power, etc. When it walks like a Sky, looks like a Sky and smells like a Sky, then its probably a Sky - so a reasonable assumption; even if the assumption is wrong. Which has nothing whatsoever to do with ones former profession, Cliff. Nevertheless, I accept and understand your petulance, given it is the natural progression of some to be affronted by an educated/alternate view. And yes, science and scientists aren't always right, but "most" scientists understand somewhat more than ones plumber mate down at the local watering hole (following science is a far cry from being a scientist). Otherwise we would have said plumber operating the Hadron Collider or doing brain surgery. To follow science does not mean one fully understands all the complexities, or how to identify the scientists that are compromised by money or alternate agenda (see Sky news). Although many do by virtue of the fact that Sky dredged up a scientist that would tow the Murdoch/fossil fuel party line. Think of it in terms of those not familiar with the lithium sector and the market mafia, and the recent false flag manipulations of GS. Most here knew full well what those rat bastards (GS) were up to and rightly called it out as BS. But those not full conversant with the lithium reality or how the big (bad) players work swallowed that turd whole, causing the SP to dip. Not quite a science analogy, but you get my meaning, one hopes.