If the problem at James Bay is arsenic treatment/disposal shouldn’t the quarterly say as much and refer to a purported 180 day extension mentioned by a previous poster to iron this issue out? Or was this mentioned in the talk but but not the written announcement?
Allkem General Discussion, page-1593
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3,559 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)