I sorry if i,ve missunderstood what happened I may have it wrong , but i understood that it was CHM's funds that got the ball rolling. What if the directors had used the funds and kept it in CHM hands [Were the directors acting in the best interest of CHM shareholders lending out chm money to buy an asset for another company they were directors off,They were acting for 2 companies at the same time wern't they? ,apologies if I have this wrong] Thats how I understand it The fact that MMX were able to keep it going with further fund s of there own is separate to the first issue , I feel. Why couldn,t have CHM done the same? they had the money to start with. MMX were broke weren,t they?
I
CHM Price at posting:
8.4¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)