Ann: Landowner Negotiations Successfully Completed - Frewena, page-462

F me man. Anyone sitting with exposure to ICG at the moment would have to be comfortable enough that the potential of exploration success in current Aus tenements outweighs the lack of any success previously, otherwise, why the f are they still invested? I always hate seeing this question, but I'll ask it anyway, why are you even invested then? Why the 'held', or if that's a mistake, why bombard these threads with the same questions? Because if these matters were so pressing for me, I'd be putting it to someone who may actually have some answers for me. In fact, here's an offer, put forward your questions (the ones that can be answered without breaching disclosure rules) in a concise little list for me, and I'll ask them for you. I'll even copy paste the response for you here. Reasonable, no?

They said they'd drill in Peru and they did. Was it the result shareholders wanted? Hell no, but they drilled. They said they'd drill in Australia and they did. They were delayed and shareholders kicked up a stink about it and they responded accordingly. Was it the results shareholders wanted? We don't know because we don't have any assays. So what is it that you're not happy with?