Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Will matriarchy replace patriarchy?, page-221

First 221 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
BenGrahamReborn

13,177 Posts.

21

17/08/22

14:30

Post #: 63167921
Share

Originally posted by Parsifal: ↑

no I’m not contradicting myself at all. My point has been consistent - that attitudes towards women have little to do with competence of capability and a lot to do with other factors. Height, how intellectually threatening they are, views about their roles.

Theses are all biases. The real skill is to be able to recognise when we are falling back to these biases and to learn to collect data to get the best person, pay for performance etc. yes biases are “natural” but that doesn’t make them right or useful. They are simply a neurobiological method of avoiding cognitive overload.

Expand

so on that basis will you admit you too have biases? If so, I am happy to unpack some......
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Trump just dropped a 200% tariff bomb. Here's how to cash in

Week 28 Wrap: Tariff chaos back for some reason; CBA holds strong

LIS

'Opens doors': Li-S Energy the first Oz company to produce lithium metal foils

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

VMM

'Big tick': Viridis positions for global leadership with Colossus pre-feasibility study

ILU

Rare earths stocks surge as Pentagon buys big stake in US REE miner

AAU

Antilles brings Chinese ally on board to keep Neuva Sabana work chugging on

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

CWX

Carawine faces Fraser Range JV collapse as IGO moves to scrap partnership

HotCopper Highlights: RIP to Botanix (for now); Droneshield new ATH; Trigg mystery halt

First 221 Last

SPONSORED BY