PEP-11 Media Release, page-13

everyone knows why Scomo rejected PEP-11, he put his own interests ahead of the nations. Winning a few seats was more important than finding a solution to the NSW gas crisis. I don’t know why he needed to be sworn into certain portfolios in secret by the Governor General and I believe the GG also benefited from that.

In April there was a senate hearing with a questionable donation given to a group called ‘Australian Future Leaders Foundation’. It was questionable because the government gave an $18M grant to the program over 5 years plus $4M every year thereafter. They don’t have an office, staff, website or any evidence of what they are actually doing, this is a group the GG is involved with and has since stood down from day to day administration duties. It may be a coincidence but I would love to know when the secret swearing ins happened in relation to the donation that was given to the group the Senate believe was a misuse of government funding.

Investors in BPH were mislead and lied to with some losing a great deal of money because of the secrecy. I know I wouldn’t have invested as much as I did if I had known what KP wasn’t actually the decision maker.

Misinformation is being used to mislead the public on the matter of PEP-11. If PEP-11 is an environmental disaster waiting to happen like they claim then all offshore rigs should be shut down immediately until safety procedures are stringent enough to satisfy all government bodies. They place photos of ‘Deepwater Horizon’ next to their articles to place fear in the minds of residents which they know will have a physiological effect. The curvature of the earth allows the human eye to see about 8km, so unless wicks and co. are flat earthers they are deliberately lying to their respective communities.

Maybe highlight all the disasters that have happened in Australian waters, under Australian governance and safety procedures on rigs off our coast. If the experts in their field deemed this to be a safe undertaking who has the right to question many people, with many years of experience in this field, who have actually done their due diligence? A few people making things up, promoting fear and telling lies, whose sole purpose is to keep their own seats for their own benefit? If they were impartial would they not also speak of the good that would come of such a project? Would they not provide all facts, good and bad? How can people make an informed decision when all they are being fed is misleading information to create fear within the community?

if you want to promote something, promote the truth.