speculative?
RAP claimed our Covid algo had a sensitivity of 92% and specifity of 80%. Data confirmation results actually found 84% sensitivity and 58% specificity, both of which do not meet Pfizer's minimum
conditions. the only two possibilities are that RAP made yet another mistake or they fudged the results. this is not speculation, these are mathematical facts.
BOD and Keating unanimously recommended shareholders take every single offer Pfizer has every thrown our way. and then Keating goes on to push the narrative of how risky this business is and the difficulties that are ahead without Pfizer. these are facts
Tony specifically requested not to be engaged about Pfizer scheme during that call recently. also a fact
no CR will occur above 10c, who in their right mind would want this thing?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RAP
- Why you should vote NO from a non professional investor
Why you should vote NO from a non professional investor, page-8
Currently unlisted. Proposed listing date: 4 SEPTEMBER 2024 #
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)