4DS - Anything but Charting, page-25185

And that's one thing I'd like to know following on from this, who is the head , because no CEO chooses to leave when on a good wicket. no bod collectively comes to a group decision so quickly to remove a new ceo. Would be interesting who calls the shots or has the say. someone has a lot of pull.

and further to khoutams, exactly, who proceeds with a full batch order with out testing an initial wafer to confirm fixes and then test the single unit till it's dead prior to making a full batch. process doesn't add up. Some clarity is definitely needed on the steps that have been taken.

be interesting to know if the issues are due to scaling to too low of geometries before they could even walk. All the patents and the available data sort of hides what scaling is at. And even with the last patents being submitted in2019, it misses last 2 years of advancements and adaptations. Even though most are to do with layers.

i think with their breakdown of the last batch ,to save some sort of face, some figures need to be relinquished from the NDAs. Shareholders need information of the failures and why they occured again. Shouldn't be allowed to hide behind an nda like this because it was stated the issue was fixed, one would assume testing prior to a batch would have been done, so for such basic and instant failure, it seems no testing was completed.


little frustrating.