expectations, page-8

FF

To be fair on GI, that is the point he(?) was trying to make in relation to me pressing LNC and CNX threads over the past 12 months or so for such information.

There is a subtle difference though ... to me there was a compelling reason to ask such questions of two companies valued in stratographic levels in blue sky with almost zilch substance ... and imo this was encouraged by the content and crafting of their ASX announcements.

By contrast, CXY has never (sigh) gone there, instead preferring to pick and tick away the boxes required to get across the line with a commercial ucg project ... from the outset. The blue sky of CTL, fertilisers and methanation was always in the background and there for the record ... I happen to like that approach wrt this emerging technology.

Its a story of bolters and stayers ... and it isn't yet run.

For GI, I said my piece earlier ... here it is again "I expect they'd make such (technical) disclosure to turbine manufacturers and funding sources ... so the most significant indicator of technical success we might see could be by inference embedded in bank feasibility studies and announced funding arrangements".

Cheers
Dex