Ann: Suspension from Official Quotation - Annual Listing Fees, page-135

Explains a lot, so you prefer to continually bleat on about;
~ delisting
~ insolvency
~ not paying fees
~ no funding
~ trading whilst insolvent
~ liquidators taking LLL shares back
~ company not answering emails
~ not answering phones
~ transparency
~ listing rules
** so on and so forth, but lack the real confidence to take the opportunity to show any courage of your convictions, and accepting a challenge
re: if the listing fees are paid, not commenting on FFX again.

** look up the word oxymoron, then you will understand the following statement **
re: "(sic) ....if they intended paying the fees why didn’t they rather than put holders through this additional stress"
~ not only is your continuous rambling on about the points (indicated by the ~ symbol) above, it is the complete epitome of an oxymoron as what additional stress do you think all your repeated over and over claims could be having on shareholders? but also shows a total and reckless lack of empathy to those share holders that may be feeling any stress / anxiety to the current position of FFX.

It is also that lack of empathy that is evident in your efforts to try and discredit anything posted that has a positive bias,
~ point of evidence, even though I had shown time stamps for sent/received email you were quick to dispel it as an automated response, you need to be a little more aware on how IT systems work ~~ automated email responses are instant, no time lags and definitely do not have any relevant content (as in answers to questions) in the body of the email.
~ I will also add, that as you were not privy to the content of the email exchange I had with the company, your claims were baseless and just another example of pure unadulterated down ramping.
~ I also note that since offering the challenge your confidence in FFX being delisted is somewhat softening with the inclusion of "if" as a prefix in some posts

As @Red Baron posted earlier, even though it may have been a little bitter for some, both Cowden & Borg hold circa 22M shares, and as large shareholders they will be working to get the best outcome BUT VanEck may also come into play here as they are holding circa 54M shares and from memory purchased at $0.59c ? at approximately circa $32,000,000.

@Cranium73 re: "der Fred" I'm getting my post count up,
Here is a poser for you, lol
~~ "pins and needles mixed with some bran" ~~

@abu re: Ganfeng eyeing of the escrowed shares
~ other than the Company wanting the 20% holding in LLL as a funding vehicle for M & A activities a couple of years down the track, I also believed it to be a "block" for any hostile take over attempts on LLL?

@GARETH78 I have no doubt that the fee will be paid, and the Company will remain listed and I also opine that there will be a further extension to the current voluntary suspension as funding is being negotiated.
~ but as you indicated the first option may have been the release of the escrowed shares as the primary source of funding and on to a plan B now, but without any other information (as I previously posted) could that have been the actions of the same board that hastily sold off the other parcel of LLL shares?

cheers