"You are a laugh - fancy posting a graph that destroys your argument!"
Where darling, does it destroy my argument?
this is what I said not long back to you -
"When one looks at the rate rise since about 1950, it’s pretty obvious that something is clearly going on, and it’s far more likely to have something to do with us."
now, if you care to go back not too far in HC history - you will see how I had many many many times noted the WW2 spike in temperatures.
also, you will find in many many posts a long while back that I said that Co2 was
-a lagging indicator.
- clearly corelated to temperature
- that world climate was a very complex system
and, time after time after time I stated that "it’s presently far more likely to have something to do with us."
now, I also stated that I thought the climate debate is largely a waste of time and that we should all be thinking of engineering for a better planet (because we can) - building better systems and if we can get away from burning dirty black stuff like coal and oil - then, we should
so, as far as I can see - none of that argument argues against itself
in your tiny room in your tiny mind, you may think it does - but, I'll stand by the guts of it.
I've no idea exactly what Co2 is doing - it may well lag in rising at first - then, become self sustaining.
somehow
It may well affect something else - like methane, (via temp. melting permafrost and the like) which then, may or may not lead more temperature rise - but, what is very very clear - is that it is closely connected with temperature
even you appear to see that one ----------------- AFTER someone points out the obvious to you.
