Hi OldGeo,
Given the original Target Horizon was largely based on GAL's discovery i.e. didn't include the sediments/dolerite and was generally located several or more metres above the sediment contact - I think it's fair to assume a bit of a graphical oversight/slip-up with the line placements, and it should have looked more like this:
Also in fairness, I think the diagrams were probably devised to show the general intent, rather than trying to be anything too detailed or highly specific, at this early stage.
However, it does remind me a little of GAL's discovery hole location in their announcements - showing a big red star quite a bit further north than the actual location. Further away from the CNJ/GSR boundary. That was sloppy, too.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CNJ
- GAL Discovery Hole NRC266 versus CNJ/GSR Discovery Hole MTJV001
GAL Discovery Hole NRC266 versus CNJ/GSR Discovery Hole MTJV001, page-163
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CNJ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.201M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | $598 | 597.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
19 | 31483312 | 0.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.2¢ | 46957719 | 38 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
19 | 31483312 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.002 | 46957719 | 38 |
0.003 | 10979610 | 10 |
0.004 | 3500000 | 3 |
0.005 | 4500000 | 3 |
0.008 | 730000 | 1 |
Last trade - 10.02am 14/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CNJ (ASX) Chart |