to the statement posed at the start of this thread, which was so warmly received:
"Simple observation;
Every IPCC error revealed so far exaggerates fears of global warming. That alone says plenty. "
i would offer my own simple observation:
Every IPCC error revealed so far has been exaggerated (and misrepresented) by skeptics. That alone says even more.
so ironic that your average skeptic is willing to crucify a 3000page assessment, written by over 1200 different authors, over a couple of mistakes, but would happily turn a blind eye to the endless stream of "errors" both malicious and otherwise, of the so called truth seeking skeptics.
truth has never been the issue. blind faith, the accusation flung so often at alarmists, seems to be the order of the day when it comes to judging skeptic propaganda.
a level headed approach to this debate would be to QUESTION EVERYTHING. alot of rot doing the rounds, and the lead pushers seem to be ones who cry foul the most.
