intrum reports needed, page-15

All speculation. Frankly I don't think a director should be taking calls from shareholders or should be answering politely but formally and without information, as per the suggestion about RG today . Directors are bound by fidicuary duty, corporations law/asic regulations as to how they communicate - all for very good reasons. Fundamentally, the market needs to be informed, in the right manner. When directors don't do this, it leads to Chinese Whisphers and misinformation. I would rather have no information than misinformation. Everything in this thread is pure speculation.

no information = yes
over = some misinformation
Otherwise. Speculation.

If RG has responded that way, I for one have more faith in him as a professional director, as opposed to the dick-swinging fillerbuster type of director spouting misinformation.

Let's all cool it and wait and see.