"No Scott. You gave me a fact that doesn't answer the question.I'm not disputing the fact that you provided.". ..... well you certainly didn't make that point..... now kindly explain why my answer doesn't satisfy what you consider to be an answer..... my point, I argue, does entirely answer the question of why vaccinated people result in a lower transmission rate than related to UNvaccinated people.
you set up a series of questions that can be answered by reference to my point above.
but you ask for a clearer explanation, and the nature/naivety of your questions indicate you don't quite understand the dynamic of how viruses and the immune system work, so here
https://www.doherty.edu.au/news-events/setting-it-straight/issue-118-persistence-of-sarscov2-long-covid-spectrum-immune-dysregulation is the preferred source of information according to the Morrison Gov, the Doherty Inst.
if you need further information to find your answers you can browse the Doherty for more and more.... its all there.
but just to satisfy you on the questions:
- Y
- Y
- Y
- Y
- this last is dubious because lower viral load carries a much reduced ability to transmit infection to others, regardless of vulnerability. Yes of course its possible, yet probability is greatly reduced.
DM you're trying to make a point that vaccinated people are MORE likely (higher probability) to transmit viral infection to others. this is the point that is untrue.
