What’s CBE Worth, page-884

Guess it's legit concerns re why not hole #6 result first but wait for #6 and #7 together instead. Whilst i also have a question for myself from below images (thanks to BrassTack's sat image again), if #6 is not so good and #7 is still drilling, why they already started setting up the #8 (?) newest drill hole which seems to be a 500m step-out hole SW of NCP09 which in turn has least mineralisation intersections so far (comparing to NCP07,08, and 10) from the figure below too, instead why not moving infill drillings to the NE of historic 12-14a hole and NCP10 (which has longer mineraliation intersections) or a new 500m step-out hole NE of NCP10 beyond 4km long strike? Guess it's not just because of the convenience of moving gears a few kms shorter to the SW. I do suspect the tech team there has found some 'key' to the region, as i also remember clearly when Martin said to Paydirt magazine's interview beginning of this Ngami drill campaign (in late June or early July) that "we should have visuals in the next few weeks" (when the drillings haven't even started or just started?), that's the level of confidence the team has! And that may explain (they haven't elaborated though) why they chose to go for SW of NCP09 step-out first (unless the 2nd rig is already onsite then that will be different story..). imo only