Running discussion on SP, page-73395

I don't know mate. I'm suggesting that this information is incorrect. and that perhaps the reason it's being put out there is so that someone can say "hey look at this orchestrated fake news being spread by AVZ, they cannot be trusted they are just as bad as we are". I can't understand why someone would build this fake momentum lawyers account and claim that zinjin are done. but I can understand the company statement that an arbitration schedule is being created. why would you need a schedule to arbitrate a dispute from which one of the parties has removed itself? and of course I'd love to be wrong. I'd love for my half a million dollars not to be arbitrated by a single judge at the icc. I'd love this to be confirmable in a social media post from a lawyer in twitter. but it doesn't stack up.