Court Links for Hearings, page-163

another attempt at deflection - you've deliberately twisted my point into something else again.

Insidious.

the CEO didnt actually "lock horns" - you may find, if you care to look, that the CEO wasn't even in the country until a month later........

"locking horns' occurred after it became apparent that the MO had pulled the trigger with "no hard evidence" and had dug in, rather than concede a massive error. A good on the CEO for fighting, else, there would be no company at all.

Now that same MO is using its scale to defeat the very shareholders it disenfranchised

Now that's the "fairness"" you should be discussing, not this suicidal suggestion of litigation at all costs, even to possible insolvency.