General Discussion Topics, page-74682

Have you even looked at the numbers pal. Do you even understand them. We have listened enough about you opinion which I believe to be incorrect. Contractual terms are ALWAYS ' implied ' .....' inferred ' .....by definition. You have stated that Sayona will NOT be getting the rights to the FIRST production. Who is right on this point ? Certainly NOT you. You're playing some game on this forum which has now clearly become evident and found out. You couldn't possibly be a holder given the sheer amount of time you bag out the Management. They are not the best I agree , but they have new people in executive positions which they are on-boarding - so they are growing into themselves and will ultimately have all the boxes ticked in this regard I'm sure. You just don;t seem to have the patience and are playing some psych game on these forums.

Could it be that Management just know where they're at and are comfortable that they will be producing the FIRST production towards cash-flow & profitability for this Company and are content with how they are progressing towards the ' Wherewithal ' of the Market. They can't control what the market feels towards the SP anymore than you think you can.

However the least you could do is look at the new information as well as the Final Accounts and add to the forum in a positive way. Because there is heaps of positives here. I've read the accounts and there is plenty to interpret in a positive light if you have taken the time as I have. I am only one person though and can only address in a post one critical issue at a time. And I have chosen to dispel your continuous rants by tackling the information which has just come to light with the costings emanating from the Mining Contractor announcement.

Perhaps you could do the same instead of continuously trying to sell the notion that the PFS was prepared instead of a DFS. Surely even you can now see why that was the case , and that a DFS will most likley be knocking now that costings have been affirmed by Management. And I'm not going to get into this back and forth arguing on Hot Copper. Mainly because I don't have the time , nor do I like this sort of communication when really , its only my Investments and my sharing of my opinion that I care about.

Once that is completed and discharged , you can agree to disagree all you want , but I will have no further engagement with someone who is not updating and reviewing their comments as new information comes to light. That's what this forum should be about not spinning our wheels on endless comments once new information reveals that those comments are unwarranted and factually incorrect. The off-take is ' Mute ' now for so many reason's - Why can't you understand that.

Unless you have interests in Piedmont and / or working off subtle moves in either of their respective SP's or taking advantage of market ebbs and flows or negative or positive sentiments , I see really no other reason why you would continue to push this barrow. Especially now that we have critical operational data PLUS new executive appointment's in a President and COO of Sayona Quebec.