No hedging requirements? They have to hedge if they draw A2 - it's just written in a way that brushes it off. There is also nothing to say that tranche B doesn't have a hedging requirement. Given that B is unamended from the original deal other than interest rate and repayment/maturity terms it's highly likely to have the same terms as Tranche A, which required 80% of PDP.
This is my gripe around poor communication. They clearly didn't want to highlight the hedging restrictions after leading with a title like that. That's no excuse for not being extremely clear in the wording. Yep, you could argue differently around tranche B - but doesn't that just prove the point... we're in the dark again. As soon as I read the superfluous use of incremental in the second line of the MU statement I was annoyed.
Plain english. Not hard.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- OEL
- Ann: Otto Debt-Free and Unhedged
Ann: Otto Debt-Free and Unhedged, page-8
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add OEL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $52.74M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.2¢ | 1.2¢ | 1.1¢ | $19.49K | 1.708M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
13 | 12087762 | 1.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.2¢ | 1134045 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
12 | 10087762 | 0.011 |
9 | 16557452 | 0.010 |
1 | 100000 | 0.009 |
3 | 1495122 | 0.008 |
2 | 550000 | 0.007 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.012 | 1100000 | 1 |
0.013 | 13720103 | 12 |
0.014 | 10404235 | 11 |
0.015 | 4127000 | 5 |
0.016 | 2714285 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 13/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
OEL (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online