Addressing the original thread title
"how come 300% more than expected ?"
Its academic but perhaps Johns maths is a little rusty or enthusiastic...
expected thickness was 40
confirmed thickness was 120 now 130
80 would be 100% thicker than 40
120 would be 200% thicker than 40
130 would be 220% thicker than 40
quote below
"Electric log analysis completed subsequent to the Companys last announcement on 26 February 2010 has confirmed the presence of 130m of coal (in seams > 1m thick), ie 10m thicker than previously reported.
This more accurate assessment, which removes any miscalculation resulting from core losses or other wellsite issues, shows that the coals encountered were 325% thicker than the maximum anticipated pre-spud thickness of up to 40m."
Typo?
Is my maths rusty ?
I make 325% to be a thickness of 170m
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CTP
- how come 300% more than expected?
how come 300% more than expected?, page-62
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CTP (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
4.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $36.26M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
4.9¢ | 4.9¢ | 4.8¢ | $42.95K | 876.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 520854 | 4.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.9¢ | 90000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 520854 | 0.048 |
1 | 100000 | 0.046 |
2 | 173952 | 0.045 |
1 | 50000 | 0.044 |
1 | 175000 | 0.042 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.049 | 90000 | 1 |
0.050 | 155000 | 2 |
0.054 | 96554 | 1 |
0.056 | 19995 | 1 |
0.058 | 172431 | 1 |
Last trade - 14.23pm 13/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CTP (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online