Ann: Thick Pegmatites Intercepted at Trigg Hill Project, page-153

So why have EFE given us this list of pegmatite intercepts but no table with actual details? 3 pegmatites in ETRC001 totalling 29m, within a 60m hole, with the first being 0-17m. So where are the other 2 located between 17m and 60m? The same goes for every hole.

Don't even get me started on ETRC006. 7 pegs spread throughout 128m with not a lot to go off.
Seems to be a lot of detail missing here for an announcement.



Further, not even a hint of a mention of lithium mineralisation in the announcement, just pegmatites. That is concerning because they really should be mentioning it if they identified anything. These are not unsubstantial pegmatite intercepts, whether or not they are lithium mineralised is the biggest concern now. And I would be very concerned if Mr Calderwood couldn't identify lithium mineralisation seeing as he wrote the book from which the below information on Trigg Hill is summarised. Also concerning is if this turns out to be a NYF-rare earth pegmatite because that means no lithium, this is somewhat supported by the below information with some REE-bearing minerals.




Ragshak pXRF can't be used but LIBS detectors can pick up lithium. But pXRF could have also been used to identify LCT pathfinders. I'm neither here nor there for handheld detectors in lithium RC samples, surface rock samples sure though.


This photo can't be the best one they have for trying to spark the fire of lithium under the share price? I'm in agreeance here with other holders that there isn't any lepidolite in here, it doesn't look micaceous at all. What is does look like is quartz and feldspar dominant especially in the first 25m. 40-64m looks to trend more towards quartz/albite (Na-feldspar) and looks to be the more interesting region of this hole but the lack of disclosure for anything lithium related is questionable.