That is indeed strictly correct, but also beside the point, because we do need to hit some platonic ideal of absolute truth in our trials, but only the FDA’s operational definition of success. And the FDA’s operational definition of success is passed if there’s only a 1 in 20 chance, or less, that the result was a fluke. ie p<0.05. We don’t have to prove it to God, just the FDA.
Ann: PAR Reports Successful Primary Endpoint in Phase 2 Trial, page-75
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 41 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
23.5¢ |
Change
0.005(2.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $82.20M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 23.5¢ | 23.5¢ | 23.0¢ | $85.35K | 365.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 280011 | 23.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 24.0¢ | 44703 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PAR (ASX) Chart |