q and a on abc, page-72

  1. 3,972 Posts.

    Larlie

    I see no reason why anyone should object to a non religous point of view, It is called tolerance and we see so little from bible bashing dimwits.

    Same last night with the horrid performance from the Burke man who almost made out it was blasphemphy to say it as it is. I am appalled we have such preacher morons representing us in this day and age. Plus those that REFUSE TO RESPECT the point of view of others as Burke did is part of a government prepared to introduce internet filtering. Here was an elected politician PREACHING against a opposite point of view. It makes my stomach churn. HE DOES NOT HAVE THAT RIGHT. HE IS A POLITICIAN NOT A DICTATOR AND NO GOD. We are getting as bad as some Islamic states where speaking against the Koran is GRAVE and not tolerated. Sorry I see the preacher moron Burke as scary, real scary.

    Why do people even want politicans who are religous nuts, we see the mess countries like this end up. Exactly what Dawkins suggest. Ideology is dangerous. Now we have growing censorship, net filtering and now close to claims of blasemphemy from a politician. We ahve been there, doen it and wars fought to free ourselves from such oppression. Why go down that path again. Yet we are clearing starting down those paths of oppsression.

    Careful what you wish for.

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.