Regarding EV batteries., page-152

https://www.anteotech.com/how-to-make-a-lithium-ion-battery-part-2/

What is the relevance of Anteo’s battery data?
Answer: Batteries utilising Anteo X have much greater energy density – more fuel.
It is bemusing to see a company release data for prototype Anodes that far exceed the dreams of leading battery companies and it gets no recognition from the press, or stock market for its achievements. When we think of companies like Sila offering a 17% improvement valued at 3.6bnUSD and ADO at 218mAUD there is a real paradox.
No other company is within cooee of Anteo. Their dreams are for 20% Si Anodes in the years to come. Anteo’s leading prototype has 70% Si, producing over 2,000mah/g. Its closer to market anode produces over 1,000mah/g. So, what is the relevance of this data in the world of us run of the mill punters??
We have a couple of electric appliances at home (DJI drone and Stihl Whipper snipper), so I looked up their data which is publicly available; and for one of the leading electric car manufacturers (Kia) and did an analysis of the benefit Anteo anodes bring to the table. This was done on the assumption that the Cathode and other elements of a battery can cope with the extra energy density of the Anteo prototypes. I had my calculations checked by an engineer friend of mine and th logic by a PhD with battery exprtise. The outcome is set out in the table below.

	Column 1	Column 2	Column 3	Column 4	Column 5	Column 6	Column 7	Column 8	Column 9
0	Battery	Purpose	Capacity	Range		Anteo >1,000mah/g	Range	Anteo 70% Si	Range
1	DJI Model MBI 1480mah 11.4v	drone	16.87Wh	15 mins		86.2Wh	1.33hr	172.4Wh	2.5hr
2	Stihl Ap 300	whipper snipper	227Wh	30 mins		1,786Wh	3.9hrs	3,573Wh	7.8hrs
3	Kia EV6	car	77.4kWh	426km		481.8kWh	2,652km	963.5kWh	5,303km

What does this data tell us?
That weight, range and size issues resulting from the anode are overcome. Imagine small consumer drones that can stay in the air for 1hr 20mins. As a person that can be using a whipper snipper for hours at a time 30mins is not enough. It is much easier to refill the petrol tank. A battery that lasts 4hrs would be ideal. Then there is the holy grail of markets, cars. We live in regional Australia, so an electric car with over 1,000km range would be a no brainer. Even the Anteo 1,000mah/g advanced prototype appears to meet these criteria easily. There must be some reasons why Anteo is not being run over by companies wishing to adopt its anodes. I can see two:

1. The issue of battery capacity is moved from the anode to the cathode. The best prototype cathode I could find produces 560Wh/kg, for over 800 cycles. Simple logic says that if an Anteo anode is combined with the cathode in a 1:2 ratio anode:cathode then for the advanced prototype a vehicle range of over 1,300km is achievable and for the 70% Si anode, this doubles. I am sure there are other issues but this solution would address the major one; capacity of anode and cathode.
2. Another issue may be the number of cycles the anode is functional for. The advanced Anteo 1,000mah/g prototype we know lasts for at least 400cycles in testing (i.e. cycle = fully charged - fully flattened). We also know that our phones shut down before they get very low. We know that Kia and more and more E-car makers recommend operating between 20% and 90%, the quick charge range. That is because batteries do not degrade nearly as quickly if a battery is not run down to nil nor charged to the maximum. Using the 2 Anteo prototypes I would be happy with over 900kms normal operating range and 1,800kms for the 70% Si model.

This set of information is emphatic. The Anteo anode is highly relevant for use here and now. It is applicable for many applications now.