The way I see it, JS clearly made an executive decision to remove the old deadwood which came at a cost. That cost was redundancies which costs $$$, hence why staff costs was so expensive. From my perspective that was a necessity that had to happen. The way some of you guys were throwing around the 249D word, I'm sure most would agree this had to be done.
However, as such a concerned SH, I'm sure you'll be attending the AGM and can ask them the Q in person right?
I'm not justifying our position right now btw, I agree it sucks balls, just explaining it in more detail than you have explained.
Ann: Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CAY (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
7.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $103.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1074500 | 7.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 7.7¢ | 29880 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 08/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CAY (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable