MNS threads on HC, page-403

perhaps Paul Stratton could file some his alleged emails with the court so that may further support his claims that currently stand with zero evidence

we can then publish those email here on HC ?

he needs to support his claim of whistleblower protection which is central to his claim of lost compensation

he claims he was not sacked for cause but was sacked because of ethical improprieties he objected to and spoke up about - yet he has offered no evidence in support of these claim - hence the submission by IM3NY to the court to dismiss the claim on the basis of no evidence

as yet the court nor the market have received a shred of evidence that any such impropriety happened