Ann: HPMSM Feasibility Study Update, page-59

Sorry but this is just air fairy pie in the sky stuff.

To describe the management of E25 as incompetent shows your cluelessness and naivety. The management of E25 has done an excellent job over the past few years, turning this company into a producer with still very few shares outstanding.

Ok, the production of manganese ore is not going as originally thought and announced. But that is a circumstance that can be eliminated and hopefully will be. Nobody is free from mistakes and a crucial mistake was certainly that one installed a system that was too cheap. I think there has been too much reliance on external technical consultants here.
It is good that one could learn from the past mistakes, especially in the current phase - also in terms of future technical equipment/contracts and their clauses, if one will hopefully publish a well-known manufacturer of car batteries/electric batteries shortly.


After many years of research and development, the HPMSM seems to meet the requirements of the manufacturers, the chances are good that an acceptance agreement and financing agreement will soon be concluded with a well-known manufacturer (Tesla, VW, Ford etc...??), and it are currently only about 152 million shares of E25 in circulation - and you - NAF - describe the management as incompetent? RIDICULOUS!

They are only concerned with badmouthing the company and are only referring to the start-up problems in production and losses to date. You obviously have no vision for the whole thing. It would be better if you think the management is incompetent to sell all shares of E25 with immediate effect!