Ann: Commencement of Definitive Feasibility Study at Big Sandy, page-109

Interesting that you have to again deflect. Yes I’m aware of sovereign risk. Argentina is a country with its own issues but location has not been an issue for existing giants Allkem and Livent (the latter operating for 20 years on the same salar as the project you mention). As for management of that project, the MD re-mortgaged his house and went all-in. He holds 7% of the company as a significant holder, more than can be said of Paul Lloyd of AZL. The projects could not be more different than AZL, that’s for sure: conventional, proven techniques; seperate resources both with extensive studies released to the market; high grade low impurity lithium, and *measured* resource. Doesn’t mean it’s for everyone of course, but at least investors can judge it all for themselves as there’s no ‘black box’. It’s not just a case of “trust me, bro” which seems to be the message AZL is giving its shareholders.

All resource juniors carry risk, but there’s a world of difference between risk and red flags.