Excellent summary Iam.
It sure is baffling as to what their "status quo" problem is at present.
Hopefully we'll find out shortly.
One thing in your post intrigues me:
"10 Mar 2009 MEO stated its working interest in WA-360-P had increased to 70% by contributing 90% of the cost of the Artemis 3D survey of 360-P. This led to the present share arrangement of MEO 70%, CUE 15% and Gascorp 15%."
Who coughed up for the remaining 10% of the 3D seismics?
Was it one of the PP's or was it a residual of the RDI funding?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MEO
- artemis boundary
artemis boundary, page-47
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)