Ann: Organisational Changes, page-171

Well.. to be fair, I assume you mean from the time stamp of your post onwards, because just in the last few days there very clearly was "price worthy news" that being:

Source: https://www2.asx.com.au/markets/company/may

Because as we both agreed, the director transactions show shareholder alignment, and boosts confidence, etc etc. As for the in house lawyer, separating the secretary/CFO, with new individual hires, and a manager hire, it clearly says to me they are expecting "more workload" (possibly production).

But assuming you mean in the future, well... I tried to describe some of the news that may be imminent in this post:65229747, but I guess you consider it not "price worthy"? I do. The way I measure it, is by looking at the inverse, let's say they said the alternative to what we predict, e.g instead of "we booked Sheritt", let's say they say "we can't find an operational rig", that would be price worthy news, but unfortunately inverse/negative. So to say they have booked the Sheritt rig again, while it may/may not move the share price, I would still consider it price worthy news, because if the opposite news was released, it most likely would be "price worthy" by any measure, and it would most likely move the share price.