Court Update November 28th 2022 Medcan v CGB, page-100

Hi @jcurve and@Christopher67,

I am just curious as to why everyone is trying to make a possible link to mining when that would involve another major Transformation of activities, wouldn't it? It started when a completely new member, who is a non-holder, showed up and seems to know about the activities of the business, and it is now all anybody can talk about.

The references to mining go back to the late 1990s and as far as I am aware, the Feldmans have held interests in both private and public companies for the past 25 or so years.

Why couldn't it be another Cannabis play? That is what they are approved by the ASX to do.

Just more ghosts, rabbit holes and conspiracies, isn't it?

Food for thought, and I could be wrong!