Just thinking out loud here. Most here agree that it's the land that goes up but the actual house goes down in value. If a new house has it's fair share of upkeep (rental mentals), would you be better off buying an older house in a better area? I'm asumeing that renters would pay for number of bedrooms etc and location rather than age of the house. A car will depreciate less each year as it gets older, would this also be true for a house? If this is true why are new houses so popular? A well kept old house in a nice location could be the ideal purchase...
I'm kind of green on this stuff so please forgive me if I'm stating the obvious.
- Forums
- Property
- new house vs old house
new house vs old house
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla