Which of the top 6 would that be
@church70 ?
Anyway, I'd hesitate to use the word 'investment' when it comes to CGB.
They've never, ever delivered on anything, in any guise they've ever operated under - the evidence is all there, documented in every financial report, every cap raise, every unnecessary dilution of existing holders, a currently unexplained / vague extended suspension, as well as attempting to defend non-payment of a rolling contract in the courts - paying an external law firm to do so whilst there is ample legal representation on the BoD to carry this out for no extra expense, a Managing Director claiming full annual salary for 6-mths residency whilst managing another company in California (Mars Mining) which shares the same registered address in Sydney as CGB yet no admission to there being any conflict-of-interest.
On top of that we have the bizarre advance notification that expenses for this quarter will be higher (can't wait to see that figure ! ) because of 'shareholder services' related to holding the recent AGM !
So currently we have this issue of
neither CGB nor the ASX explaining to the Market why there is still a suspension in place
despite the obligation to update the Market by the 23rd December.
If the ASX can't ensure a 'Fair Market' companies like CGB get free reign to run riot so (imo) it's way past time the ASX made cgb divulge what this 'proposed acquisition' is - if for nothing else but to prove it actually exists.
