Pinto,
It seems we agree that our present military is up as an adjunct to the US , and we cannot rely on the US.
It also has pushed us into place we shouldn't have been.
So , what exactly does , think security not defence , actually mean in specific terms?
I see a defence force focused on deterring an invasion of Australia , with limited force projection .
So eventually a defence based on mobile missile, air and submarine forces with adequate electronic surveillance to take on seaborne invasion.
Adequate air defences to maintain at least a break even at the coast.
Army , a rapid response force to try and disrupt any beach head , and be available for natural disasters in Australia and in our region
Hence my agreement with the recent buy , as that fits with that philosophy.
So , over to you , some flesh on the bones please.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- government buying himars
government buying himars, page-105
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)