''Oh ... you did some research for me, my good friend DBT9. Thank you.''
No, I did the work decades ago. Now I am wasting my time spoon feeding you.
''But if we go back to Plantinga's argument, how would you use that ample knowledge to rebut his argument? It would be truly amazing if you can do that.''
This just shows that you don't have a clue on what I described or the material I quoted and cited.
I doubt that you read any of it. If you did, you got nothing from it.
Again, the notion of free will comes in several forms, Libertarian free will, Compatibilist free will, the common perception of freely choosing between options, etc.
And as it happens that we are dealing with 'God declares the end from the beginning,' this is related to determinism, therefore related to Compatibilist argument for free will.
Now if you hadn't noticed, which is quite likely, to save on time and effort, I quoted Silverstein's rebuttal of compatibilism
Which you made no effort to address because you either read none of it, or did not understand what is written.
The other possibility is that you argue for the sake of arguing, regardless of what is said.
