Thanks, Stock Observer for the clarification, my apologies for missing that name at the top of that post. I couldn't see the reference clearly at the top on my small phone properly, as it looked very similar to posts you have written to me before about contacting the company and misleading people. You also followed up immediately with a 2nd post on a different thread directly after tagging me.
So you and the forum can understand my questioning and concerns. Here are the posts I am referring to. Not being " precious" ...there are concerns with your line of questioning S.O. Post #: 65056180 Contacting the company reference CannTab Post #: 65055552 Misleading people reference Post #: 65055044 Misleading people reference Post #: 65054425 Contacting the company reference CGB Post #: 64658748: "Or Neil could ask the company to be allowed to share their response here and make it crystal clear for everyone." Post #: 64653901 "Did you receive a response to these questions sent to CGB?" Post #: 64551289 "I hope you get the answer you are after. I also hope you will front up here will the the full response" Post #: 64511434 "Please try not to mislead people Neil."
