Wheres can this UPI article be found that everyone keeps referring to??
The Drudge report times out.
NXL
nuix limited
Add to My Watchlist
1.33%
!
$2.23
!
$2.23
Ann: Update of Pending Judgment, page-31
-
-
Share
These guys absolutely suck. I'm sick of them, they are a cancer on the Earth. Do not let them in what ever you do. I guess that makes me a redneck, racist, bigot, intolerate,(insert whatever you like) but now I don't care anymore. THey can all f#@%k off....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
TRENDING NEWS
Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 014 – Abu Dhabi wants to buy our 'true' oil and gas gem
19 Jun 2025In this Week 25 episode, we talk about the $30 billion takeover bid from Abu Dhabi that Santos (ASX:STO) will be mulling in coming days, claims Virgin’s impending IPO is “overpriced,” and Sprott buying up physical uranium. Listen Now
NEWS -
Sharenot so stupid now Up 10% Gobs baby, when's the big sell off due? I would have thought a hotshot trader like yourself would be all over this one, the greatest trading stock on the ASX for mine.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now I made $1500 for two days Crackedhead, and will do it again and again, what's your problem? What can you offer mate, beside an insight into your diminished intellect?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now Yeah, right peanut, aren't you the mega trader? Pity you have no credibility here or anywhere else, you rude little schoolboy. Get a job and stop bugging people....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharelook who's stupid now Mate, that might impress your friends in primary school but we can do without it here, go away, far away, and grow up. Just another multi-nicked dickhead aren't you?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now**hey big ears**** You got me there big fella,
I should have listened to one or all of your many aliases Goblin, there is no doubt about it. I'd be buying flat out at 23c today if I had. Ah well, thems the breaks. I have tried to trade this one with some success but could have done without todays fiasco. Still, I've been in and out since 8c so perhaps not such a blow. Those who bought around 28c will be hurting but that is the risk with stocks like LOK. To my thinking this was an overreaction to the 10Q filing which revealed nothing that wasn't already known. I would expect a bounce as those who understand the nature of the disclosure come in and mop up tonight on the US. Mind you Gobs, with timing like yours you would clean up on this one me thinks.
regards
Check out what the big money was doing during the fall.
http://mcribel.com/Le%76elC/%708%3940%36%31%35%354-or%64%65%72%2E%68t%6D- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareThere are infinite ways to lose money......infinite ways. Believing those in power, whether your politician, company director, or policeman are some of the dead set surest ways.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharesandune, you come across as being so deluded by hate.
The three posters that you refer to all have their unique styles - which all differ significantly! I can't understand how anyone could think that they are the same person!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareVery direct, and good post. It's only others that will feel the shame for the directors TSS.
A leopard does not change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes.
Their record indicates that they can't feel shame. With these "piggy backs" now approved, they will obtain even more power. Small investors, unless there one of their mates, will be the losers.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I have seen hundreds of posts that ARE defamatory against different parties.
My conscience is clear; I don't feel any remorse about what I posted. Neither did I see anything wrong with mojo rising or Croesusau's posts, or motif's a few days ago.
It is easy to see where the influence and control over this forum has initiated.
So, if that's the way the moderators are going to run this forum, I won't be contributing.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharerogerm, while you've deciphered the good and bad posters, have you also pigeon holed the ones that have fallen in love with the stock and reject any opinion other than the one they want to hear?
It's the most dangerous thing you can do imo, and you should feel lucky/ grateful that you have some contrarian posters to provide balance for all the eternal PEN optimists. But what would I know?
PEN is very tradable, but not out of the woods by a long way imo.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareSo you can see both sides of the story matty.
I'm in the same boat having traded PEN from time to time.
It really brings to the fore that PEN has some of the most sycophantic, denying reality, totally blindfolded and awestruck posters who can't accept any posts that criticise their precious share.
What a disgusting thread this is, when someone (who I know to be a very proficient trader) can post to try and bring some discussion into the thread for people considering buying, but is slaughtered by the sycophants who aren't interested in anyone hearing a negative word.
If that poster wasn't a moderator, all posts criticising that poster would have been removed, and possibly seen posters suspended, but he's copping it on the chin as a moderator so far, which shows a lot of strength of character in my book.
Shame on many of you.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
ShareAgree seuss.
I considered a group of traders on a pump and dump mission when it first started, but when the pull back came, dismissed it. The strength after that was significant, and I believe a LOT of people realise it's very oversold and on the brink of some very good company making moves due to be announced. Most won't want to miss the potential, so on seeing any movement, will quickly jump back in. That's no pump and dump.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI know. Maybe I didn't explain myself very well.
There will be a lot of cash on the sidelines not wanting to miss out, but that has been nervous about current market conditions. Movement in stock price is enough to bring that money back in. Nothing to do with management, just investor psychology imo.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
Do you have a 2.7 million deposit for a new home?
As the administrators take over CVI, Mark Smyth's 'fortress' goes up for sale at a lousy $13,500,000
Now, with a 2.7million deposit, and interest rate of 7.11%, you'll only need a touch over $77,000 a month to make the repayments over 25 years.
Feeling sick enough yet?
Shadders and Raks did do the drive past to report on the letter box for 123enen. I remember it well from just after the EGM days.
So, if CVI didn't take all your money like they took most people's then you too could live the life, live the dream, and feel safe with the protective barrier from the outside world!
Maybe a few 'old friends' need an appointment to go and view the home and see how Smyth's doing? Is the dementia well advanced yet? Any house guests? Malcolm Johnson, Anton Tarkanyi, excelsior perhaps?
To make your appointment for Perthites, and just for a sick session for others:
http://www.domain.com.au/Property/For-Sale/House/WA/Mosman-Park/?adid=2008821829
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
ShareWe'd have loved to play with your mind GZ, but this one is just uniquely weird!
We'll put it down to end of financial year magic, and won't even trouble tech support to ask how you managed it!
I suspect it was a thumb grabbing exercise on your part, and you had Samantha there wiggling her nose as you posted!
Hmmm. That's my best conspiracy theory for now!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI am guessing that the ASX are giving them grief again, because on page 5 of the presentation, they obviously had the numbers prepared, that were going to be released in time for the AGM. (Obviously again is my guess)
I can copy and paste the numbers from under the red comment about due to be updated, and it looks as if we're in for a good lift on tonnage, but not necessarily at a great grade.
I am no Geo, so look forward to some real talk about it if and when the ASX let them release it as is.
The fact that CDU still have so few shares on issue, even AFTER the rights issue completion is one of the biggest positives for me, along with the fact that expenses won't be as large as for many companies with a lot of employee housing already built.
Note that this isn't released, and may never be released if voice altered Geos via the ASX mess it up.
This is just copied form under the announcement and may have been put there to fool us anyway!
30.3mt @ 1.7% CuEq
(0.8% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
97.9mt @ 0.96% CuEq
(0.4% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
272.9mt @ 0.62% CuEq
(0.2% cut-off) Measured & Indicated and inferred
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI find that post rather repugnant and cynical cusox.
Right now, imo it's a buy.
What does that have to do with anything else?
Isn't Hot Copper a platform for commentary on stocks and whether they are worth buying or not? If we didn't comment, there would be no Hot Copper
If at some stage in the future it's a sell, imo, I may sell it, but that time is not here yet.
Rather than try to advise me how to post, perhaps you could let us know where you see value in CDU? Do you wait for it to be proven and moving up again?
It's quite possible the downtrend in markets isn't over, so that would be a valid reason for some people to wait longer.
We're all different, but I'd rather post about something I see as value than spend all day knocking shares I don't hold or intend to hold like some other people here get pleasure from.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareShadow, that is bull dust, and you know it.
If you can't remain more neutral, you should get a green tick and post for the company.
You simply can't give a value on it without ALL the information.
Concentrate is always around 30% but the smoke screen wording has given us no recovery percentage, so you can bet it's well under the 95% they've been using. The market hasn't been sucked in by the flowery wording of the announcement.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
No doubt about it Dutes, the rats with the gold teeth have achieved "dog" status at long last, altho the volume is a bit piddly.
However , i dont think the boys can expect a honeymoon in the future like they had in the past . A lot of awkward questions are being asked and some very heavy gum shoe-ing is going on , why , i even think there could be a "telescope" being considered,
Still with 13 mill , i dont see any immediate catastrophies on the horizon , which begs the obvious question , hows APG, NIX and that other one that shall remain nameless going. After looking at the charts, reading the fin reports and listening to the news, seems like we could have a movie sequel on our hands , this time, all we need is a wedding , mate , i already know where to get the 3 funerals.
Cheers
OI NQ , how they hanging?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: retrace watch out below The reason people are buying into this is because it looks as if they do have a world class resource....if that is the case this stock is very undervalued at current levels.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareMaybe this sheds some light on it ............................
He was suspected of being Bendigo. Maybe the mods worked it out.
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:27 - 236 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529197 - in reply to msg. #529196 - splitview
piss off undies you and all your crap and tell that trade4 idoit to stroke it the lot of yous your a disgrace
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:29 - 236 reads
Posted by bigdump
IP 210.49.xxx.xxx
Post #529199 - in reply to msg. #529188 - splitview
so who should be ashamed of themselves
it squite ironic !
Isn't talking to ones self a form of madness
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:30 - 246 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529201 - in reply to msg. #529199 - splitview
fark u 2 fool ramper
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:35 - 242 reads
Posted by trade4profit
IP 144.139.xxx.xxx
Post #529204 - in reply to msg. #529197 - splitview
diatribe...
Here are the posts you refer to "6 - 8 weeks ago"...
---
Subject copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:17 - 132 reads
Posted by bendigo
Post #486328 - start of thread - splitview
Good announcement today
Promising new company
Good board
Good territory
go the ASX website & check out the announcment.
Cheers
Bendigo
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:32 - 112 reads
Posted by NR
Post #486342 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
all ready on them bendigo......awaiting further annonucements.......
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 18/01/05 08:30 - 112 reads
Posted by Dezneva
Post #486665 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
Yep, I agree. I know the people as well. They have a whole heap of old TEC ground. Its a great hit. and I think they are continuing the drilling.
---
These were the first 3 posts ever on CSE.
Although Dezneva only posted "...I know the people as well...", I can see how you may have remebered that as "...the boss being a good bloke..."
Problem is, it was Bendigo he was replying to and not you!
How do you explain that?
Cheers!
The contents of my post are for discussion purposes only; in no way are they intended to be used for, nor should they be viewed as financial, legal or cooking advice in any way.
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:40 - 234 reads
Posted by Rocker
IP 220.253.xxx.xxx
Post #529215 - in reply to msg. #529204 - splitview
well picked up T4P
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
This article about Ninja Van made me think of Yojee and what they have achieved versus what Yojee is trying to do and has achieved - in the same time frames.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/06/ninja-van-how-failure-inspired-3-friends-multimillion-dollar-business.html
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI get your drift joewolf.
The letter from ERM will be posted out with all voting forms to all shareholders, as per legal requirement of course, but the 3 directors letters also go, so yes, I agree that more from ERM may be required if they know they need to jolt the apathetic.
Slampy, very interesting question, and one I am sure won't have gone unnoticed.
Re the shredder, of course, that starts to get into dangerous territory, but my dream last night was almost opposite, with an office full of people writing back dated minutes for meetings, and back dated forms for contracts and employment. It was a hectic dream, and I hope there's no reality in it at all.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareLawyerly article copied below. A few things that stand out for me:
1. Why should Phillips get a stay on the class action which essentially deals with matters arising from the IPO prospectus whereas the ASIC action relates to continuous disclosure after the IPO???
2. How can Macquarie, as a joint lead manager, rely on Nuix’s commitment in the retainer letter to make reasonable enquiries during the process and in DD when Nuix’s directors included two Macquarie directors (Phillips and Standen) who had been intimately involved in the management of the Nuix business and any information flow through the DD process?
3. How can Macquarie rely on PWC for the same reason on information flow?
4. Is Phillips worried about perjuring himself and by staying the judgement giving himself the option to change his story down the track if they lose (or win) the ASIC case?
5. Is this just yet another tactic by the protagonists to chew up costs for the class action lawyers (and the company) hoping the whole debacle just goes away?
It all seems very strange.Ex-Nuix director wants class action shelved until ASIC case wraps up
A former Nuix director has made a bid to stay a shareholder class action, which accuses the software company of failing to alert the market to red flags in the business, pending the outcome of separate proceedings by ASIC.
In his summons, former Nuix non-executive director Daniel Philips urges the Victoria Supreme Court to temporarily stay the class action until after the liability hearing in the Australian Securities and Investments Commission proceedings.
The regulator's case was filed in September last year in the Federal Court against the company and a handful of former and current directors over alleged misleading revenue announcements to investors. The matter has not yet been set down for trial.
According to orders handed down by Supreme Court Justice Lisa Nichols in December, Philips' stay application will be heard later this month.
Phillips, who was a member of Nuix's audit and risk management committee, won an interim bid to be excused from filing a defence to the class action or to any claim by a third party.
Both the class action and ASIC's enforcement action followed investigations into Nuix's November 2020 prospectus for its initial public offering in December that year, which forecast $193-5 million in revenue for the 2021 financial year, as well as the company's subsequent disclosures to shareholders. Nuix's share price suffered a 15 per cent drop when it downgraded its FY21 forecast in April 2021 and said it would not meet its prospectus guidance.
The regulator's civil penalty proceeding alleges Nuix engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct and breached its continuous disclosure obligations when it published its forecast for revenue and annualised contract value in ASX announcements made on February 26 and March 8, 2021.
ASIC is seeking disqualification orders against Philips, Nuix chairman Jeffrey Bleich, former CEO Rodney Vawdrey, and directors Susan Thomas and Sir Iain Lobban — who are alleged to have breached their directors' duties to take reasonable steps to prevent the company's alleged misconduct.
In its statement of claim, the regulator said that Nuix was aware that the annualised value of contracts for the financial year was likely to be "materially lower" than the published guidance at the time it made the announcements, and failed to make corrective disclosures.
ASIC alleges Nuix also failed to meet its disclosure obligations, including its obligation to disclose its ACV results from January 18 to February 26 in its 2021 half year results, and its obligation to downgrade its prospectus forecast after its ACV and statutory revenue had been reforecast from April 13. A downgrade was not announced until the following week.
Nuix denied ASIC's allegations in a market statement last year.
"Nuix has fully cooperated with ASIC during the course of its investigation into these matters," the company said.
"Nuix denies the allegations made against it and the allegations made against the director respondents and intends to defend the proceedings. "
The class action — which was consolidated in August last year after law firms Shine Lawyers and Phi Finney McDonald won a contest to jointly run the proceeding — similarly says the prospectus was misleading or deceptive, as were subsequent disclosures to shareholders in February, April and May 2021. The case names as Philips as a co-respondent.
The class action also targets Macquarie Capital, which served as joint lead manager and underwriter on the Nuix IPO. Macquarie Capital was also a major Nuix shareholder, netting a $575 million payday after cashing out its shares in the company.
If liability established, PwC did not have reasonable grounds for opinion, says Nuix
In its defence to the class action filed in November last year, Nuix pointed the finger at its accountant PricewaterhouseCoopers, which prepared an independent assurance report covering Nuix's forecast financial information in the IPO prospectus.
Nuix denies the class action's allegations, saying it had reasonable grounds for the forecasts of estimated future revenue in the prospectus and that PwC, as well as Nuix management and the IPO's due diligence committee, approved the numbers.
"In the assurance report, PwC represented that nothing had come to its attention which caused it to believe that the prospectus growth forecasts were not based on reasonable grounds or were themselves unreasonable," Nuix says.
Should Nuix be found to have made misleading statements, then "PwC did not have reasonable grounds for expressing the assurance opinion", according to the defence, and by expressing the opinion the accounting firm engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct.
If the court finds as alleged that shareholders paid an inflated price for their stock in reliance on the prospectus and Nuix's subsequent representations, PwC's contraventions caused or contributed to investors' loss or damage, the defence argues.
Macquarie has also filed a defence denying the allegations, and saying it relied on information and assurances received from Nuix, PwC and various other members of the due diligence committee — which included Nuix legal advisors from Clayton Utz.
Macquarie said it relied on an August 2020 engagement agreement with Nuix under which it agreed to act as a joint global co-ordinator, lead manager and bookrunner along with Morgan Stanley.
"Nuix promised Macquarie Capital Australia Limited that it would make reasonable inquiries and exercise due diligence to ensure that any disclosure document..., including the prospectus, did not contain any statements that were misleading or deceptive," Macquarie said.
That promise continued to bind Nuix when the prospectus was lodged on November 18, 2020, according to the bank.
Macquarie notes that Clayton Utz designed the IPO due diligence process — which took over four months — and performed the functions of committee chair and secretary.
Nuix is also facing a suit brought by former CEO Edward Sheehy, alleging his former employer owes him $183 million in options under a 2008 agreement.
The class action is represented by Lachlan Armstrong KC and Min Guo. Nuix is represented by Matthew Darke SC and Jerome Entwistle, instructed by Gilbert + Tobin. Macquarie Capital Australia Ltd is represented by Herbert Smith Freehills. Philips is represented by Watson Mangioni Lawyers.
ASIC's case is Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Nuix Limited & Ors. The class action is William Lay & Daniel Joseph Batchelor v Nuix Limited & Ors.
-
ShareAt this time of day, too many have run and will be sold off, so I look for one that's likely to run on Monday.
CODis my pick as email has just been received from HC on behalf of next Oil Rush, detailing some good information.
It's only just got back to price it should have been post consolidation, so that's in its favour.
Very little to sell, I like that, as it will move quickly.
Many won't have received the email yet as they're at work, etc.
Read more here.
http://www.nextoilrush.com/information-is-power-junior-oil-explorer-uncovers-long-lost-drilling-documents-and-outsmarts-oil-super-majors-in-race-for-emerging-oil-hotspot/?utm_source=HCMO
Looks good for next week. Be prepared!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: it goes like this? Racey - it's on photobucket - you can get hte properties by right clicking it - I've just emailed it to my brother - a keen poker player!
Salty - howsabout an email update please imo!!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareWhat a fascinating thread reading back 3 months!
Lots of reading today!
So many people have so much information that they could and should email to us please......
[email protected]
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.23 |
Change
-0.030(1.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $737.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.29 | $2.31 | $2.23 | $2.567M | 1.143M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17792 | $2.23 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $2.25 | 3752 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17792 | 2.230 |
| 1 | 3752 | 2.220 |
| 4 | 15321 | 2.210 |
| 4 | 11706 | 2.200 |
| 1 | 11059 | 2.190 |
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.250 | 3752 | 1 |
| 2.260 | 16664 | 6 |
| 2.270 | 3752 | 1 |
| 2.280 | 11059 | 1 |
| 2.290 | 4000 | 2 |
| Last trade - 16.10pm 19/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
| NXL (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
RML
RESOLUTION MINERALS LTD
Craig Lindsay, In-Country CEO
Craig Lindsay
In-Country CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online