Jaded
Just to reiterate, everything I have posted is actually the truth from where I sit and not an attempt at throwing mud. From my point of view I stated that I could not divulge the source for privacy reasons but I when I used the F word in "" that was actually what the "guru" said. Now I think what he meant was not actually Fxxxx in the literal sense but rather in a milder sense that the technology will not live up to expectations...he just tends to call those things Fxxxx he his language.....
Anyway I openly have admitted to not knowing that much about Dyesol and the technology and that is why I sort the opinions of others as any good analyst should do. I was just reporting back what I got. I was just surprised by the push back I did get from what I regard as a thoughtful source, hence "guru".
So what I have done is taken some of the thoughtful responses from the supporters of Dyesol who responded to my thread and sent them to him and hopefully we will get a response as to why he is so negative. I will then pass it on.
In the meantime, Jaded, as you seem to know a lot about the company can you answer a few simple questions for me that may help;
1) Who would you consider to be the key people driving the company forward in the current phase?
2) Can you point me in the direction of any working products that are for sale and using Dyesol technology?
Cheers Lord
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?