Nasdaq listing, 1 Year on., page-30

@MickeyMantle356 if you're taking requests:


One thing I'd like to know (and from reading commentary I'd reasonably extrapolate that others are interested as well) is how Does the company balance out the options offered to retail against the options offered to this strategic placement?

Granted, retail is a collective not a singular investor and retail do not make up the lion share of the markets, but neither of those 2 things take away from the fact that one set of investors was offered 35c options with $1 piggy back options expiring shortly, whereas the other was offered 20.5c placement with a 28c option and a far longer timescale.

It seems to me, that if underlying a company's central ethos is 'investor value', then that frame of reference should be applied to all investors.

I like IHL, and based on track record I'm prepared to go on faith that this was the best option for us long term.

Precisely why I'm not complaining or selling.

I also appreciate no one can see the future, but you have 2 fairly radically different proposals here and the simple fact is that this is left a bad taste for a lot of investors.

It would be nice, at some point, the hear from the horses mouth So to speak on that particular circumstance.