Michael Moore: Serious Film Maker or Socialist Weasel ?
"Fahrenheit 9/11 his next film contained many glaring inaccuracies and was simply an excuse to attack the Bush administration.
Moore's standing as a reputable film maker is undeserved considering, Bowling for Columbine, was a disgusting attempt to make money from a tragedy under the guise of promoting a cause that the director believed in.
His business acumen is hard to deny. The target audience of these films is not likely to be conservative or middle of the road Americans, but if he wants to be considered a respectable journalist at any time during his life, he must learn to accurately portray events and not wildly skew the facts to fit his viewpoints."
My vote - Absolute weasel ..
(but he has made money from the fools who take him seriously, the lefties adore him).
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/251754/michael_moore_serious_film_maker_or.html?cat=40
- Forums
- General
- moore: serious film maker or socialist weasel?
moore: serious film maker or socialist weasel?
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 40 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)