Albanese in Mardi Gras: "This is celebration of a modern Australia: diverse and inclusive", page-156

i'll just say gay marriage is perhaps a hateful slander of the incredibly brave/or stupid compact between two heterosexual adults of different genders [men frm mars women frm venus] who must defy such odds by pro-creating to raise healthy children into smart well adjusted adults.

for me homosexual marriage does not deserve to even be on the same page in terms of sacrifice,
-oh mebe they have the economic power not uncommon for the homosexual community to buy an impoverished hetero couples babies to then rear up as pro rainbow adults, successfully or not just like hetero couples?

although, not sure about the full on sex they tend to have with numerous partners at various clubs/bars they frequent! -or the sexual diseases/virus' likely to be transmitted onto their young unless they are truly into each other as a united marriage, which is uncommon for such people generally.

i tend to think they should have called their kind of marriage something else so as not to cause marriage between heteros to look debased.
why not something like, "were getting rainbowed in the morning ding dong the church bell's are going to ring!!! da da de da dah!!!" i mebe wrong.
nevertheless, something else to the arrogant word 'gay marriage' bc heteros marriage is vastly different in process, involving the painful process of childbirth along with all the economic stresses this place on hetero couples?

plus heterosexuality does not come with the nepotist clannish behaviour of homosexuality or the ugly discrimination they have toward heteros? anyone trying to make it within academia or the humanities/arts will well know of a term called the 'gay militia.' whereby gays/lesbians use thier preference for each other to basically dominate the professions, or certain professions, and again i speak of the humanities.