Ann: LKE to present at the32nd BMO Critical Minerals Conference, page-27

I stand by my post and you persist in showing one of two things:
- your “research” continues to be flawed, or
- you are purposely trying to mislead readers

It has been noted in previous releases that there are “holding ponds” that the processed brine flows into before reinjection. You also have to consider how much water is actually generated by the flow sheet….and what happens to that water - re-use or re-purposed.

I imagine that the detailed information to confirm all of this will be included in the DFS and/or the Sustainability Report. We will see who is right then.

My interpretation of that diagram is that the larger ponds coloured in green are the holding ponds from which the processed brine gets reinjected. I imagine there will be strict monitoring of the chemical composition of this water prior to reinjection and that any minor treatment could be undertaken at this point (if required at all) prior to reinjection.

I also interpret the smaller ponds coloured in blue are the ponds holding the water produced by the flow sheet. This water can be reused in the process where required or any excess quantities can be repurposed. I’m guessing you do know how arid the region is and how precious this water may be for uses outside of the plant if excess quantities are generated.

Again, I stand by my comments about Kachi brine being clean enough not to warrant pre-treatment prior to processing and no (or very limited) post-treatment prior to reinjection.

My “terse” response to you that you have reposted above was not just based on your post of the 10/11/22 at 6:44am. The “terseness” of the response was due to the number of posts that were incorrect, unsubstantiated and baiting up to that point….hence the term “prognosticator”….and I see that nothing has changed!

Over and out….I.e. I won’t be playing your baiting game and responding any further to this conversation.