The topic is not "ask Hersuit for facts about firearms".
>You claimed more than once "You clearly have exactly zero firearms knowledge" so I invited a comment from him.
Which was off topic.
to the topic.
A mass shooting is an event where people are harmed.
I assume that the problem is not the shooting part, but the human harm part.
So, if you want to correct me and say "actually I only care about guns being fired" I'll accept that its off topic
from your perspective. But then, for some reason you think entire posts containing nothing but "I disagree with your opinion" are somehow on topic.
Who knows why trolls do what they do. I don't.
>Don't complain: post your proof for the claim "the black guns that terrify you"
I've done this twice.
>Finally - your answer.
>The the closest you have previously come to answering the question
Which is closer than you have ever come to answering a question, probably in your entire life.
>'what is your solution' was to say
Entirely false claim. For someone who uses "false allegation" as some type of ad hominem you sure make a lot.
Project much? Lol.
I replied to you :
>You also said "I think that firearms are a great social equaliser.
Yes. Why do you disagree?
>"So, do support the Second Amendment but not the First Amendment ?
Lol did you actually hit your head some time in the last half hour? This is one of your dumbest takes on record!
Obviously I support the first amendment.
If giving fame to mass shooters leads to more mass shooters, this would mean using this speech would be considered "incitement", not protected speech.
